Burma Media Watch 2002: April - June

Go to >> [ 2008: Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec ]

[ 2007: Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec ] [ 2006: Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Dec ] [ 2005: Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec ]

[ 2004: Jan-May | Jun-Dec ] [ 2003: Jan-Mar | Apr-Dec ] [ 2002: Jan-Mar | Apr-Jun | Jul-Sep | Oct-Dec ] [ 2001: Jan-Dec ]

27.06.2002: DVB - Un-lift prison visit for Dr. Khin Zaw Win and U Sein Hla Oo
19.06.2002: Article 19/Forum-Asia - Burmese Government Bans Three Magazines
12.06.2002: RSF/BMA - Three magazines banned
11.06.2002: Asia Times - Myanmar: ASEAN's problem child
08.06.2002: RSF - 25th anniversary of the Additional Protocols of the Geneva Conventions
07.06.2002: RSF/BMA - Reprisals against imprisoned photographer Sunny after he goes on hunger strike
07.06.2002: WAN/WEF - World Press Groups Protest Ad Ban in Burma
06.06.2002: FEER - Envoy Blasts Burmese Magazine
31.05.2002: Forum Asia/Article 19 - Burmese Blanket Ban Violates Freedom Of Expression
31.05.2002: RSF/BMA - Great concern over plight of journalists Sein Hla Oo and Win Tin
31.05.2002: AFP - Health of jailed Myanmar journalists raises concerns, groups say
29.05.2002: RSF/BMA - Publishing ban on Thai-related articles and advertising
29.05.2002: VOA - NLD reveals plan to launch newspaper in Burma
15.05.2002: RSF/BMA - Sein Hlaing freed after 12 years in prison
15.05.2002: CPJ - For Democracy, Myanmar Needs Free Press
15.05.2002: CPJ - Journalist released from prison
12.05.2002: AP - Press bodies demand release of Myanmar journalist
10.05.2002: WAN/WEF - WAN and WEF call for release of journalist U Win Tin
03.05.2002: BMA - No Signs of Press Freedom Development in Burma
03.05.2002: RSF - 12th International Press Freedom Day
03.05.2002: RSF - Annual Report 2002 >> Burma Chapter
03.05.2002: CPJ - World's Worst Places To Be A Journalist
21.04.2002: AFP - Media body asks India to explain arrest of Myanmar journalist
17.04.2002: AP - Myanmar dissident who hijacked jetliner in 1990 gets bail
17.04.2002: BBC - New Delhi-based Burmese journalist released on bail
16.04.2002: IFEX - Uighur Historian, Burmese Writer Win Pen Freedom-To-Write Awards
16.04.2002: RSF - RSF questions the true reasons for the arrest of a Burmese journalist
15.04.2002: The Times of India - Myanmarese hijacker denied bail
14.04.2002: AP - India Reopens Case Of Thai Hijacking By Myanmar Activists
13.04.2002: BMA - Soe Myint Arrest not linked to Hijacking but his Media Work
13.04.2002: BBC - Burmese activist 'missing' in India
12.04.2002: BMA - BMA calls for the immediate release of Burmese journalist in Indian custody
11.04.2002: BMA - Burmese Journalist Detained in India
11.04.2002: Pen - Burmese Poet, Uighur Historian to Receive 2002 PEN/Barbara Goldsmith Freedom to Write Awards
07.04.2002: BMA - Two prominent writers detained, their homes demolished




27.06.2002: DVB - Un-lift prison visit for Dr. Khin Zaw Win and U Sein Hla Oo

Dr. Khin Zaw Win and U Sein Hla Oo, National League for Democracy (NLD) elected representative (MP) for Insein Township constituency - 2 in Rangoon, who are detained in Myitkyina prison, are still not yet allowed the prison visit with their families.

Although their families have been trying to visit them since last May, the authority rejected it by saying that it was in accordance with superior order.

Recently, the families contacted to the prison authority to check whether if prison visit is permitted or not as they were told that they might have a chance in mid of June. But the prison authority responded them to contact the concerned intelligence officers.

When the families inquired the concerned intelligence officers in Rangoon, no reply was responded.

Since last May, all political prisoners in Myitkyina prison have been barred for prison visit. Apart from two of them, the rest of the political prisoners are re-admitted prison visit in mid of this month.

Families are very concerned about U Sein Hla Oo and Dr. Khin Zaw Win because they do not know the reason why they are still not allowed prison visit.


Back to Top

19.06.2002: Article 19/Forum-Asia - Burmese Government Bans Three Magazines

ARTICLE 19 and FORUM-ASIA condemn the recent decision by the Burmese government to ban three magazines and reiterate their calls for the Burmese authorities to revoke a recent draconian directive prohibiting reporting on Thailand.

The Press Scrutiny Board, the Burmese State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) censorship body, in June banned the magazines Kyi Pwar Yee, Mhyar Nat Maung and Living Color. Acting under a 22 May Directive prohibiting private journals and magazines from publishing articles about Thailand or advertisements for Thai products, The SPDC banned Kyi Pwar Yee because it used the word "Yodaya" (the former name of Thailand) in its latest edition. This Directive is just one of numerous Burmese laws and regulations imposing massive restrictions on freedom of expression and the free flow of information.

Mhyar Nat Maung was banned because it placed an advertisement on a page reserved for SPDC propaganda. Living Color was banned for publishing an advertisement by the MK Billiard Company, a company which was out of favour with the government because it had refused to donate snooker tables to the government-owned Myanmar Billiard and Snooker Association.

These absurd bans illustrate once again the total disregard of the Burmese government, and the SPDC, for the fundamental right to freedom of expression and the right of its people to receive information.

ARTICLE 19 and FORUM-ASIA call on the Burmese authorities to lift the ban on these magazines immediately.  We also call for a complete review of laws and rules restricting freedom of expression, including the Directive on Thailand, with a view to bringing them into line with international standards.


Back to Top

12.06.2002: RSF/BMA - Three magazines banned

"Once again, the military junta¹s censorship bureau has temporarily banned private publications for ridiculous reasons. The government is making no efforts to reduce the control of information.
 
Burma remains one of the most hostile countries to the private press," said Robert Ménard, general secretary of Reporters Without Borders in a letter sent to colonel Tin Hlaing, Minister of the Interior of the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC).
 
Reporters Without Borders and the Burma Media Association (BMA, an organization of exiled Burmese journalists) deplore the sanctions taken against the publications Living Color, Mhyar Nat Maung Mingalar and Kyi pwar yee. The two organizations called on the minister to immediately repeal these decisions and stop censoring information.

According to information obtained by Reporters Without Borders and the BMA, the Literary Scrutiny Board banned the publication of the magazines Living Color, Mhyar Nat Maung Mingalar and Kyi pwar yee during the month of June 2002.
 
According to the independent monthly Irrawaddy, the business magazine Living Color was sanctioned for having published an advertisement by the MK Billiard Company.
 
This company is said to be in conflict with the military junta¹s Minister of Sport for refusing to give equipment to the official billiard association.
 
Founded in 1995, Living Color, whose managing director is the son of lieutenant general Khin Nyunt, had never been sanctioned before. In addition, the Literary Scrutiny Board banned Kyi pwar yee for using the word Yodaya (the former name for Thailand) in its latest issue.
 
The Literary Scrutiny Board told publishers of private publications in Rangoon on 22 May 2002 that it was forbidden to publish articles or advertisements concerning Thailand. This decision followed recent military and diplomatic tension between the two countries.
 
Finally, the magazine Mhyar Nat Maung Mingalar was banned for publishing an advertisement on the page that was reserved for SPDC propaganda. This magazine, published since 1991, publishes essentially women¹s news and short stories.


Back to Top

11.06.2002: Asia Times - Myanmar: ASEAN's problem child

By Marwaan Macan-Markar

BANGKOK - Myanmar's three-week tantrum against Thailand has confirmed its reputation as the problem child of the Southeast Asian family.

On Friday, Yangon even stepped into the sports arena to express displeasure at its Thai neighbor. The ruling military junta stopped Myanmese youth from participating in an amateur competition for young swimmers from the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) being held in Bangkok. This comes in the wake of other anti-Thai sentiments expressed openly after border skirmishes late last month. They have ranged from Myanmar expelling Thai workers to denying visas for Thai officials - and even to ordering the Myanmese media to tarnish Thailand, both its present and past.

"The attacks in the media are very harsh this time, much harsher than what occurred last year when there was Burmese-Thai border tension," says Aung Zaw, editor of The Irrawaddy, a magazine published by Myanmese exiles in Thailand.

Yangon authorities have been equally determined in their role as censors. They ordered the Myanmese media in late May to omit the words "Thailand" and "Thais" in all copy.That resulted in Living Colour, a Myanmese business magazine, having to blacken out all reference to Thailand in a story about ASEAN for its June edition, says Zaw. "It is not rational."

Yangon's latest round of rage surfaced soon after the Thai army began a military exercise along Thailand's northern border in late May. The objective of that exercise, which involved some 10,000 Thai troops, was to curb the flow of illegal drugs from Myanmar and ensure Thailand's war-readiness, including the ability to deal with border threats.

According to Myanmar, the Thai army had exchanged fire with the United Wa State Army (UWSA), an ethnic rebel group with ties to Yangon that has gained notoriety for producing and trafficking drugs such as heroin and methamphetamines. Myanmese authorities accused the Thais of providing military help to another rebel group, the Shan, who are at odds with Myanmar and the UWSA. Bangkok, however, dismisses the charges.

Despite mounting embarrassment the ASEAN family finds itself in over Myanmar's outburst, regional political experts are convinced that Myanmese authorities will get away with their barbs.

"There will not be any third-party intervention or an effort by ASEAN to help resolve the issues troubling Burma," says Supang Chantavanich, director at the Institute of Asian Studies, a think-tank at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University. "The ASEAN way will prevail - to ignore and avoid taking action." Burma was the country's name until the Yangon junta renamed it Myanmar.

There are other reasons, too, that give Myanmar the license to behave like the family black sheep without being rapped on the knuckles for violating the spirit of cordiality and diplomacy.

"It is very apparent that Myanmar is seen as a prima donna project for regional unity in Southeast Asia," says Landry Subianto, a researcher at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a Jakarta- based think-tank. "Having been successful in restoring normal situations in Cambodia and the rest of Indochina, ASEAN leaders were inspired and felt obliged to bring Myanmar back to normal life," he adds.

Myanmar became a member of ASEAN in July 1997, joining Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Ever since, ASEAN members have defended Myanmar when it was subject to rebuke from Western countries for its abysmal human-rights record. For instance, ASEAN countries maintained that human-rights issues should not be included in discussions of free trade.

Also, ASEAN used special political terms to describe how it was dealing with Myanmar politically. "They came up with the ideas of 'constructive engagement' and 'enhanced interaction' - to name a few attempts," says Subianto.

And for its part, Myanmar took cover behind ASEAN - particularly the stress on regional solidarity and cooperation - when under fire from the European Union, the United States and Britain.

"Whenever the junta has been criticized by the international community, it has hidden behind ASEAN's skirt," asserts Teddy Buri, head of the Myanmese parliamentarians in exile. "The military leaders expected to be protected by ASEAN during any international onslaught."

Such support, in addition to ASEAN membership, lent legitimacy to the military dictatorship that has ruled Myanmar for the past 40 years. And the release early last month of Aung San Suu Kyi, the Myanmese pro-democracy leader, after 19 months of house arrest was a moment that ASEAN revelled in.

The regional grouping could take credit in the lead role of UN special envoy Razali Ismail, a Malaysian diplomat, to help free Suu Kyi after year-long talks he brokered with the Nobel Peace Prize winner and the junta. Yet, as exiled parliamentarian Bury observes, Myanmar has continued to be the black sheep in ASEAN. "It remains a thorn for ASEAN, showing disdain towards the spirit that brings the countries together."

On the political front, Yangon has not minced its words when it comes to Thailand, reflecting the tension, the conflicts and wars between the two countries in history.

On the economic front, Myanmar has tested ASEAN's patience by pushing ahead with domestic economic policies that violate the spirit of free trade, an ASEAN hallmark.In April, for instance, Myanmar's generals introduced a new policy that banned all foreign trading firms in an effort to protect local business. The bulk of the affected were from ASEAN countries.

Myanmar's behavior, in fact, is considered excessive, by far, when compared with the occasional disputes within ASEAN, such as the ones involving Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.

"The cross-border problems between these two neighboring countries [Myanmar and Thailand] are so far one of the most serious protracted issues that may threaten the whole stability in the region," asserts Subianto.

For him, the ASEAN way of being disengaged from the conflict in the interest of regional unity has the potential of "undermining the spirit of ASEAN".

Thai regional expert Supang has a similarly pessimistic concern: "ASEAN should get worried with Burma's behavior, since it indicates a lack of solidarity in the region. And that can grow."


Back to Top

08.06.2002: RSF - 25th anniversary of the Additional Protocols of the Geneva Conventions

Reporters Without Borders stresses to governments and the media the importance of ensuring the safety of journalists in war zones or dangerous areas

Reporters Without Borders urges all countries who 25 years ago signed the Additional Protocols of the Geneva Conventions to implement Article 79 of Protocol I, which guarantees the safety of journalists on dangerous missions.

The press freedom defence organisation asks editors and journalists to adopt and observe the principles of the Charter for the Safety of Journalists Working in War Zones or Dangerous Areas, published by Reporters Without Borders in March this year.

The 1949 Geneva Conventions govern international humanitarian law, or the law of war.  The Additional Protocols were drawn up in 1977 to expand and strengthen the protection of civilians in international armed conflicts (Protocol I) and internal conflicts (Protocol II).

Article 79 of Protocol I provides for protection of journalists working in war zones:
"Journalists engaged in dangerous professional missions in areas of armed conflict shall be considered as civilians. ()  They shall be protected as such under the Conventions and this Protocol, provided that they take no action adversely affecting their status as civilians.  ()  They may obtain an identity card, () which shall be issued by the government of the state of which the journalist is a national or in whose territory he resides or in which the news medium employing him is located, (and) shall attest to his status as a journalist.

The first article of the Geneva Conventions says that "the High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect" for international humanitarian law.

So far 189 countries have become parties to the conventions (159 for Protocol I and 152 for Protocol II), which obliges them to respect the rules for protecting journalists on dangerous missions, just as they have a duty to protect any other civilians involved in a war.

International law offers adequate protection on paper, but these rules are less and less observed by some warring parties, so in practice the safety of journalists is not always assured.  With every war, the price paid by journalists gets heavier.  Eight special correspondents were killed in Afghanistan last November.

A total of 522 journalists have been killed in the past 10 years, nearly half of them in war zones, mainly Algeria, Rwanda, the Balkans and Colombia.  As many as 72% of those killed on dangerous missions were deliberately targeted.

Sixty-one per cent of those killed worked for news agencies or the print media.  Local journalists accounted for 87% of the dead.

After paying tribute to their bravery, it is time we took steps to try to reduce the risks they run.  The Charter for the Safety of Journalists Working in War Zones or Dangerous Areas was drawn up by Reporters Without Borders with the help of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), representatives of the French foreign and defence ministries, the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), UNESCO, French journalists' trade unions (CFDT and SNJ) and the World Press Freedom Committee, along with doctors and the IPS Bellini-Gutenberg insurance group.

Although no war zone is absolutely safe, the Charter makes a number of useful proposals in the form of eight principles.  These are a commitment by the media, public authorities and journalists to systematically seek ways to assess and reduce the risks involved, not forcing journalists to cover wars against their will, using only experienced journalists and providing adequate training and equipment, insurance against illness, repatriation and death, post-mission psychological treatment if needed and legal protection.

The Charter's eighth principle, drafted with the ICRC's advice, notes how international humanitarian law (Article 79 in Additional Protocol I) helps journalists.

The Charter is being distributed to editors and journalists all over the world by Reporters Without Borders and its partners who have helped compile it through their international network of representatives and correspondents.


Back to Top

07.06.2002: RSF/BMA - Reprisals against imprisoned photographer Sunny after he goes on hunger strike

"It is now becoming a matter of urgency for the military junta to proceed to the massive and unconditional release of the hundreds of political prisoners, and notably the sixteen journalists, who are languishing in prison. This would be a significant gesture towards the international community," affirmed Robert Ménard, Secretary-General of Reporters Without Borders in a letter to Colonel Tin Hlaing, Home Affairs Minister and member of the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC).

Reporters Without Borders (RSF-Reporters Sans Frontières) and the Burma Media Association (BMA, an organisation of Burmese journalists in exile) have condemned the reprisals against the photographer Sunny (Khin Maung Win) and at least 25 other political prisoners who had started a hunger strike. Reporters Without Borders and the BMA call for the release of Sunny and the fifteen other media professionals imprisoned in Burma.

According to information obtained by Reporters Without Borders and the BMA, the photographer and cameraman Khin Maung Win, better known under the name of Sunny, was transferred on 21 May 2002 to an undisclosed destination by authorities of Kalay prison (north-west of the country). Some sources said the prisoners were transferred to Kathar prison. Their jailers had found Sunny and Khun Myint Tun, an elected MP of the National League for Democracy (NLD), guilty of having started a hunger strike in support of their demands for the release of all Burmese political prisoners. A protest movement had in fact started on 16 May in this prison, where Sunny has been held for more than three years. Prisoners at the detention centre in Kalay had already gone on hunger strike early in March 2002 in support of their demands for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and other political prisoners.

Sunny's family and friends have had no news of him since his transfer.

Sunny was arrested on 13 June 1997 along with four other NLD activists. He was sentenced in August 1997 to seven years imprisonment for his part in making a video of an interview with Aung San Suu Kyi and smuggling it out of the country.


Back to Top

07.06.2002: WAN/WEF - World Press Groups Protest Ad Ban in Burma

The World Association of Newspapers and the World Editors Forum have protested to Burma's military rulers against their ban on all mention of neighbouring Thailand and on the advertising of Thai products in the country's press.

In a letter to General Than Shwe, the head of the ruling junta, WAN and the WEF said the ban violated the right to freedom of expression and "severely threatens the economic viability of the Burmese press, which is heavily reliant on Thai advertising."

The letter also renewed WAN's call for the release from prison of U Win Tin, former editor of the daily newspaper Hanthawati, vice-chair of Myanmar's Writer's Association and a founder of the National League for Democracy.

The letter said: "We are writing on behalf of the World Association of Newspapers and the World Editors Forum, which represent 18,000 publications in 100 countries, to express our serious concern at a government order banning all mention of Thailand and advertising Thai products.

"According to reports, on 22 May the official Press Scrutiny Board ordered private journals and magazines not to publish articles about Thailand or advertisements for Thai products. The journalists were ordered to sign an agreement to comply with the directive and not to use the terms 'Thailand' and 'Yodaya' -- the Burmese name for Thailand -- in their publications. The ban extends to articles about Thai food and advertisements carrying letters of the Thai alphabet. The ban is linked to a recent increase in tension between the two countries.
 
"We respectfully remind you that the banning of articles on Thailand is a clear breach of the right to freedom of expression, which includes the right to receive information and which is guaranteed by numerous international agreements, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 19 of the Declaration states: 'Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes the freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media, regardless of frontiers.'

"Furthermore, the banning of advertising Thai products severely threatens the economic viability of the Burmese press, which is heavily reliant on Thai advertising.

"We would also like to take this opportunity to repeat our call for the release from jail of U Win Tin, former editor of the daily newspaper Hanthawati, vice-chair of Myanmar's Writer's Association and founder of the National League for Democracy. U Win Tin was arrested in July 1989, tried in a closed military court and sentenced to 14 years of prison for allegedly being a member of the banned Communist Party of Myanmar.

"We respectfully call on you to ensure that the content and advertising ban is lifted and that U Win Tin is immediately released from jail. We urge you to do everything possible to ensure that your country fully respects international standards of freedom of expression."

The Paris-based WAN, the global organisation for the newspaper industry, defends and promotes press freedom world-wide. It represents 18,000 newspapers; its membership includes 71 national newspaper associations, individual newspaper executives in 100 countries, 13 news agencies and nine regional and world-wide press groups.

The WEF is the division of WAN that represents senior news executives.


Back to Top

06.06.2002: FEER - Envoy Blasts Burmese Magazine

A magazine run by Burmese exiles in Thailand has come under unexpected fire from the United States.

At a Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand panel discussion on May 22, the U.S. charge d'affaires in Rangoon, Priscilla Clapp, ripped into Irrawaddy magazine editor Aung Zaw for allegedly writing an editorial claiming "America deserved the attack of September 11." Although critical of U.S. foreign policy, the editorial fell far short of an endorsement of the terrorist attacks. Clapp, intervening from the floor, went on to say that panellist Aung Zaw's articles critical of the U.S. did "not go unnoticed in Washington."

The U.S. National Endowment for Democracy (NED), an agency funded by the U.S. Congress, is one of many international donors that provide funding to the Irrawaddy, which has become increasingly popular in diplomatic and academic circles for its hard-hitting coverage of Burmese politics. But magazine staffers say the NED is the only donor that attempts to interfere in editorial decision-making.

More junior diplomats from Washington's embassy in Bangkok have paid visits to the Irrawaddy office to express their displeasure with other articles perceived to be critical of the U.S., staffers say.



Back to Top

31.05.2002: Forum Asia/Article 19 - Burmese Blanket Ban Violates Freedom Of Expression

Forum-Asia and ARTICLE 19 call on the SPDC to revoke immediately a recent directive banning newspapers from reporting about Thailand or receiving advertisements from Thai sources.

On 22 May, the official Press Scrutiny Board, the Burmese State Peace and Development Council censorship body, ordered private journals and magazines not to publish articles about Thailand or advertisements for Thai products. The journalists were ordered to sign an agreement to comply with the directive and not to use the terms "Thailand" and "Yodaya"  the Burmese name for Thailand  in their publications. Even articles about Thai food and advertisements carrying letters of Thai alphabet are covered by the ban.

These bans are clearly contrary to international standards regarding freedom of expression and the right to receive information, which is particularly important in relation to matters of public interest, including relations with Thailand. They also undermine the economic viability of the Burmese print media, which is heavily dependent on Thai advertising. The right to freedom of expression is universally recognized as fundamental underpinning of democracy, in accordance with Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Coming just 25 days after the release of Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest, these bans show that the SPDC still does not respect the fundamental rights of its citizen.

The ban is linked to the current intensified tension between Thailand and Burma. On 20 May, Thailand and Burma swapped protest notes after Thai troops and the United Wa State Army, a Rangoon-aligned ethnic militia, traded fire across the border. The next day, Burma closed its border checkpoints with Thailand and later announced its decision to block Thai official diplomatic missions from entering into country.

The Burmese media operate under strict government scrutiny and control. Publishing rights are vested exclusively in the Home Ministry while journals and magazines are required to submit to prior censorship by the State before publication.


Back to Top

31.05.2002: RSF/BMA - Great concern over plight of journalists Sein Hla Oo and Win Tin

Reporters Without Borders (RSF  Reporters Sans Frontières) and the Burma Media Association (BMA, in exile) called today for the immediate release of imprisoned journalists Sein Hla Oo, who has not been heard of since February 2002, and Win Tin, who has just been returned from hospital to Rangoon¹s Insein jail, where he has been held for the past 13 years.

"Only a few days after you said there were no longer any political prisoners in Burma, we have had alarming news about the plight of these two journalists jailed for having expressed their opinions," said Reporters Without Borders secretary-general Robert Ménard in a letter to interior minister Col. Tin Hlaing, of the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC).

Reporters Without Borders and the BMA reiterated their opposition to any lifting of European or US sanctions against the country¹s military regime without the release of all political prisoners, especially journalists, and the ending of censorship.

Col. Tin Hlaing said on 19 May, after the release from house arrest of opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, that the country had no more political prisoners. About 200 members of the National League for Democracy (NLD) were in jail, he said, but they were "common law criminals." However, Reporters Without Borders has identified at least 16 journalists in prison and Amnesty International says there are at least 1,500 political prisoners in Burma.

Win Tin, a well-known journalist, dissident and member of the NLD who celebrated his 72nd birthday last 12 March in detention, was returned to his special cell at Insein prison last week after several months in Rangoon¹s general hospital.  A close adviser of Aung San Suu Kyi, he was convalescing after a hernia operation and in early March was visited in hospital by the UN Special Rapporteur for Burma, Paulo Sergio Pinheiro.

Officials at the jail in the northern town of Myitkyina are refusing to give any information about journalist Sein Hla Oo, who has been a prisoner there since 1997. The Interior ministry has reportedly banned all visits to the 15 political prisoners in the jail. Sein Hla Oo¹s wife last visited him at the end of February, but has been denied permission to see him since then. Relatives of other political prisoners have been refused access too, including the wife of regime opponent Dr Khin Zaw Win in the middle of this month.

Sein Hla Oo's sentence expired last August, but he was not released and no explanation was given. Last June, he was operated on for a slipped disc and after a few days' convalescence was returned to prison. His wife, who lives in Rangoon, has visited him several times at the prison, where conditions are very harsh and prisoners suffer from malaria, the cold, brutal guards and very bad food. Sein Hla Oo is one of the NLD's 17 members of parliament who have not been freed since the start of talks between the military rulers and Aung San Suu Kyi.


Back to Top

31.05.2002: AFP - Health of jailed Myanmar journalists raises concerns, groups say

The unknown health status of jailed Myanmar journalists Win Tin and Sein Hla Oo is cause for concern, media groups said Friday.

Win Tin, a member of the pro-democracy National League for Democracy, was returned to his cell at the notorious Insein prison last week after months in hospital, a statement from the Paris-based organisation Reporters Sans Frontieres (RSF) and the Burma Media Association said. He had been recovering after a hernia operation, it said.

Meanwhile, officials at a jail in Myitkyina have refused to give information about journalist and elected NLD member of parliament Sein Hla Oo since February.

"We have had alarming news about the plight of these two journalists jailed for having expressed their opinions," RSF secretary-general Robert Menard wrote in a letter to Home Affairs Minister Colonel Tin Hlaing, according to the statement.

An estimated 1,500 political prisoners are languishing in Myanmar's harsh jails. At least 16 are journalists, RSF said.


Back to Top

29.05.2002: RSF/BMA - Publishing ban on Thai-related articles and advertising

"The military junta has just issued yet another grotesque directive which, in addition to depriving the population of news about Thailand, threatens the very existence of private publications that are dependent on advertising", deplores Robert Ménard, General Secretary of Reporters Without Borders, in a letter to Colonel Tin Hlaing, Home Affairs Minister of the State Peace and Development Council (SPDC). Reporters Without Borders and the Burma Media Association (BMA, the exiled Burmese journalists' organisation) condemn the directive, which forbids the publication of articles about Thailand and Thai advertisements in Burmese newspapers and magazines. Reporters Without Borders and BMA have called on the Minister to revoke the directive immediately, on the grounds not only that it represents an unfair financial sanction of the private press, but also that it is an act of censorship.

According to BMA and Reporters Without Borders' information, the Literary Works Scrutinizing Committee (one of the military junta's censorship agencies) told the managing editors of Rangoon's private press on 22 May 2002 that publication of articles referring to Thailand and were forbidden, as well as Thai advertisements. The editors had to sign an agreement undertaking to comply with the directive. According to the dissident radio Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB), the editors were also ordered not to use the terms 'Thailand' and 'Yodaya' (the name formerly used for the Kingdom of Siam).

A Rangoon journalist interviewed by DVB said that the ban on Thai advertisements could mean that some publications will be forced to close down. Thai companies are the principal source of advertising revenue for many newspapers and magazines.

The issuing of this directive is linked to the current diplomatic and military crisis between Burma and Thailand. The SPDC decided to close frontier checkpoints between the two countries after border skirmishes between troops from Rangoon and armed rebel groups.

Another report, published on the web site of The Irrawaddy (a magazine published in Thailand) says that on 24 May the military junta banned the business and finance weekly The Market Journal from publishing advertisements from the private sector General Service Companies. This directive follows the arrests of a number of businessmen accused of failing to comply with national accounting rules.


Back to Top

29.05.2002: VOA - NLD reveals plan to launch newspaper in Burma

In Burma, opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi has unveiled plans by her National League for Democracy party to launch a newspaper in the military-ruled country.

In an interview published by the Thai daily, The Nation, Aung San Suu Kyi said her party will apply for the right to publish a newspaper. But the opposition leader said she is not sure if such a publication will be allowed in Burma.

All media in the military run nation are tightly controlled by the government.

Aung San Suu Kyi was recently freed from 19 months of house arrest.


Back to Top

15.05.2002: RSF/BMA - Sein Hlaing freed after 12 years in prison

After 12 years in prison and two years before the end of his sentence Sein Hlaing, co-publisher of the cultural magazine Yin-Kyae-Mu, was freed from Tharrawaddy jail (100 km north of Rangoon) on 14 May 2002. RSF's correspondent spoke to the journalist by telephone. Sein Hlaing confirmed that he was in good health but said he would need time to readjust to his freedom. He thanked the human rights organisations that have been campaigning for his release. The journalist, who benefited from a special amnesty along with nine other opponents of the military junta, is due to meet Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of the National League for Democracy (NLD) on 17 May. Aung San Suu Ki was freed from house arrest on 6 May 2002.

Sein Hlaing was arrested by members of the MIS on 9 September 1990, along with the journalist Myo Myint Nyein and the poet Nyan Paw. In November 1990 he was sentenced to seven years' imprisonment for having publishing an article entitled "What's going on?", which was critical of the attitude of the Burmese army, in the magazine he co-published with Myo Myint Nyein. On 28 March 1996, Sein Hlaing received an additional seven-year sentence for having contributed to a report sent to the United Nations' special rapporteur for Burma, containing information about prison conditions and the ill treatment of prisoners detained in the Insein jail, and for his involvement in the editing of an underground publication within the prison. After six years in the Insein jail in Rangoon, Sein Hlaing was transferred to No 3 block in the Tharrawaddy jail.

Forty-five-year-old Sein Hlaing was an active member of the NLD from its inception in 1990. He was in charge of the opposition party's youth section in Rangoon.

Reporters Without Borders (Reporters sans frontières - RSF) and the Burma Media Association (BMA), an organisation of Burmese journalists in exile, welcomed the release of the journalist, but regretted that the authorities had delayed this decision for so long, given that Sein Hlaing was very weak as a result of the particularly difficult conditions in the prison. RSF and BMA, together with media sponsors and thousands of individuals who signed petitions, had been campaigning for his release for a number of years.

As far as RSF is aware, at least sixteen media professionals are still in jail in Burma. The organisation is particularly concerned about the fate of the journalist Sein Hla Oo, whose prison sentence ended in August 2001, but who has still not been freed. In addition, the journalist and NLD founder member, Win Tin, held in Insein jail since 4 July 1989, is in a very weak state after numerous illnesses.


Back to Top

15.05.2002: CPJ - For Democracy, Myanmar Needs Free Press

By Kavita Menon
 
When the military government in Myanmar announced the release from house arrest of Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, an official statement made a tantalizing promise: "We shall recommit ourselves to allowing all of our citizens to participate freely in the life of our political process."

What could the generals in charge possibly mean? The last time the junta allowed citizens to participate in the country's political life was in 1990, and the government ignored the election results when it became clear that the regime had lost badly.

Suu Kyi's release May 6 came after months of secret talks between the opposition leader and the ruling generals. It's time to let the public in on the discussion. If the government is serious now about permitting the public a voice in the country's affairs, then the first step toward political reform must be to lift state censorship of the media. Myanmar, which was known as Burma before the junta renamed it, is a country in crisis. The economy is a shambles. One-third of all children under 5 are malnourished, according to the United Nations, and more than half a million citizens are HIV-positive. The country is one of the world's leading exporters of opium. Its jails hold more than 1,000 political prisoners.

Yet, information about these issues is hard to come by because real journalism is nearly impossible. Local journalists are forbidden by state censors to publish almost anything of substance and are subject to imprisonment for simply expressing a dissenting view. "The censorship board has told us we must not write about AIDS, corruption, education or the situation of students," an editor said last year. "We also cannot write about any bad news, and we must be careful about everything political. That does not leave very much for us to publish."

Witness Suu Kyi's release, which grabbed headlines around the world - but not in Myanmar, where state-controlled newspapers and TV neglected to mention it.

Censorship used to be obvious, with the Press Scrutiny Board either inking over or ripping out offending sections from magazines and books. In the past few years, however, the censors have become subtler, forcing editors themselves to make the required cuts and adjust layouts to hide the damage. Because these last-minute changes can be costly, self-censorship is widespread. And, even when journalists do tackle sensitive topics, they often write in an elliptical style that is designed to confuse the censors but can be equally puzzling to ordinary readers.

Restrictions on foreign correspondents also have helped ensure that Myanmar's problems do not receive the international attention they deserve.

The regime announced that "national unity, peace and stability" must accompany any moves toward democratization. But these worthy goals will never be born of repression. To get there, the junta must consult the people and this time listen to what they have to say. A national conversation, carried through free media, would be a beginning.
 
Kavita Menon is the Asia program coordinator of the Committee to Protect Journalists, a New York-based press freedom advocacy group. This is from the Los Angeles Times.


Back to Top

15.05.2002: CPJ - Journalist released from prison

New York, May 15, 2002 -- The Committee to Protect Journalists welcomes the release of journalist Sein Hlaing, one of nine political prisoners freed this week by Burma's military rulers.

The journalist had spent more than 11 years in prison.

A spokesman for the regime announced yesterday, May 14, that the prisoners, all members of the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD), "are in good health and reunited with their respective families."

Their release comes a week after NLD leader and Nobel laureate Daw Aung San Suu Kyi was freed from house arrest.

Sein Hlaing, publisher of the magazine Pe-Phu-Hlwar, and Myo Myint Nyein, the magazine's editor, were arrested in September 1990 and sentenced to seven years in prison.

The two were jailed for publishing a pamphlet featuring a satirical poem titled "Bar Dwae Phyit Kon Byi Lae" (What's Happening To Us?), which the Burmese junta claimed was anti-government propaganda.

On March 28, 1996, prison authorities extended Sein Hlaing and Myo Myint Nyein's sentences by another seven years each. They were convicted, along with at least 22 others, of producing clandestine publicationsincluding a report presented to Yozo Yokota, the United Nations special rapporteur for human rights in Burma, describing the horrific conditions of Insein Prison.

Myo Myint Nyein was released along with four other political prisoners on February 13, 2002, during a visit by United Nations envoy Paulo Sergio Pinheiro.


Back to Top

12.05.2002: AP - Press bodies demand release of Myanmar journalist

Bangkok, Thailand (AP) -- Following the release of opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest, two international media organizations urged Myanmar's military rulers on Friday to free one of her colleagues, journalist Win Tin, who has been in prison for nearly 13 years.

The World Association of Newspapers and the World Editors Forum said Win Tin should be released ``as the next step in the confidence-building process between the government and democracy advocates.''

The two Paris-based groups said they made the appeal in a letter to Myanmar's junta leader Gen. Than Shwe. Excerpts of the letter were faxed to The Associated Press. The two groups said they represent 18,000 publications in 100 countries.

Win Tin, a recipient of the World Association of Newspapers' 2001 Golden Pen of Freedom Award, is one of the founders of Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party.

He was arrested on July 4, 1989, tried in a closed military court and sentenced to 14 years in prison for allegedly being a member of the banned Communist Party of Myanmar. He is being held at Yangon's Insein Prison. The association said he was sentenced to an additional five years in jail for possessing writing materials. He is reported to be in poor health.

Last year, San San Nwe, Win Tin's co-winner of the Golden Pen of Freedom award and a leading female journalist in Myanmar, was freed after serving seven years of a 10 year sentence.

Paris-based Reporters Without Borders says at least 12 journalists are still in jail in Myanmar, also known as Burma. The military, which has ruled since 1962, keeps tight control on the media and stamps on any sign of dissent.

The junta has refused to hand over power to the NLD, which won the 1990 general elections. Suu Kyi's release has raised hopes that the junta may be willing to restore democracy.


Back to Top

10.05.2002: WAN/WEF - WAN and WEF call for release of journalist U Win Tin

The following is a 9 May 2002 WAN and World Editors Forum (WEF) letter to the prime minister, Gen. Than Shwe:

Sr. Gen. Than Shwe
Prime Minister and Chairman of the State Peace and
Development Council
C/o Permanent Representative to UN
Email: myanmar@un.int

9 May 2002

Dear Prime Minister,

We are writing on behalf of the World Association of Newspapers and the World Editors Forum, which represent 18,000 publications in 100 countries, to call on you to release journalist U Win Tin from jail immediately.

Following the ending of opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi's house arrest on 6 May, we urge you to release U Win Tin as the next step in the confidence-building process between the government and democracy advocates. U Win Tin, former editor of the daily newspaper Hanthawati, vice-chair of Myanmar's Writer's Association and founder of the National League for Democracy, was arrested in July 1989, tried in a closed military court and sentenced to 14 years in prison for allegedly being a member of the banned Communist Party of Myanmar.

During his 13 years in jail, U Win Tin has been severely beaten, held in solitary confinement for almost one year and sentenced to an additional five years in jail for possessing writing materials. We understand that his sentence will only expire in July 2008.

It is our organizations' view that the continued imprisonment and victimization of U Win Tin constitutes a deep blemish on the international standing of Myanmar which can only be erased by his release. We believe that his continued detention remains a barrier to peace in Myanmar and of great alarm to the international community.

Furthermore, the detention of U Win Tin constitutes a clear breach of his right to freedom of expression, which is guaranteed by numerous international conventions and we remind you that the United Nations Commission on Human Rights considers that 'detention, as punishment for the peaceful expression of an opinion, is one of the most reprehensible ways to enjoin silence and, as a consequence, a grave violation of human rights'.

We respectfully call on your government to demonstrate strength, compassion and sincerity in the reconciliation process by releasing U Win Tin immediately.

We look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.

Yours sincerely,

Roger Parkinson
President
World Association of Newspapers

Gloria Brown Anderson
President
World Editors Forum

cc: Mr Kofi Annan, Secretary-General, United Nations
Mrs Mary Robinson, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
Mr Koichiro Matsuura, Director-General, UNESCO

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Similar appeals can be sent to:

Sr. Gen. Than Shwe
Prime Minister and Chairman of the State Peace and
Development Council
C/o Permanent Representative to UN
E-mail: myanmar@un.int

Please copy appeals to WAN.


Back to Top

03.05.2002: BMA - No Signs of Press Freedom Development in Burma

Eleven years ago, in 1991, UNESCO proposed that the United Nations General Assembly declare 3 May International Press Freedom Day. This exceptional day was created by the United Nations on 20 December 1993, in order to remember and observe the fundamental principles of press freedom around the world.

Unfortunately, however, press freedom situation in Burma is extensively deteriorating. Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontières) has recently pointed out in its annual report that 'Burma has the sad privilege of being the world's largest prison for journalists'. BMA's own record by the end of April 2002 also indicates that at least 36 media personnel are still detained in Burmese prisons and 2 journalists are kept under house arrest. Many of the detainees are living under life-threatening conditions and some of them are consequently suffering from serious physical diseases and mental disorders. Some media personnel are kept in prison for long overdue after their sentences were unjustly served.

All news media in Burma are either owned or tightly controlled by the military junta. The junta controls all daily newspapers, radio and television stations. Privately-owned magazines are strictly scrutinized by the government censor board. The junta further tries to dominate the media by establishing publication firms owned by generals or their close associates. At the same time, it tries to limit the flow of uncensored news in Burmese available from international radio stations by harassing keen listeners.

Access of foreign journalists to enter the country is also carefully guarded by Burmese embassies abroad. A few journalists who managed to enter the country were either closely watched or forcefully expelled from the country depending upon their journalistic activities. Expelled journalists are usually black listed or declared 'enemies of the state' and forbidden to enter the country.

Despite the fact that a few journalists were released last year, there has been no significant improvement in press freedom in the year 2001. Therefore, the BMA demands Burmese military government to respect and promote press freedom in the country and refrain measures that would further restrain or undermine remaining minuscule freedom of the press.

The BMA, in a gesture to confirm its commitment to inform international community of press freedom violations in Burma and support media personnel who fall victim to the Burmese military government, launches today an Internet campaign at http://www.bma-online.net for the release of imprisoned Burmese media personnel.


Back to Top

03.05.2002: RSF - 12th International Press Freedom Day

Freedom of the Press
Friday 3 May 2002
12th International Press Freedom Day

Press freedom is having a rough time. RSF's annual report, published on the 12th International Press Freedom Day on 3 May, makes that clear: all the signs are alarming.

Repression increased in 2001 and all the figures rose compared with the previous year. In 2001, nearly 500 journalists were arrested (up 50%), more than 700 were threatened or physically attacked (up 40%) and nearly 400 media outlets were censured (up 30%). A record 116 journalists are imprisoned around the world. And ominously for press freedom, 31 journalists were killed last year while doing their job, eight of them in Afghanistan.

The situation has worsened since the 11 September attacks in the United States. On the pretext of fighting terrorism, many regimes have openly targeted journalists who dare to raise questions, accusing them of playing into the hands of those who plant bombs. This was the case in Tunisia and with the Israeli army's occupation of the Palestinian Territories, where more than 50 journalists have been wounded or injured since the start of the second Intifada.

But authoritarian regimes are not the only ones to take such liberties with liberty. In democratic states too, laws have been passed and measures taken that are also blows to press freedom. In the United States, there has been the USA Patriot Act and other measures that curb the flow of information on the Internet and also the criticism by secretary of state Colin Powell of the Qatar-based TV station Al-Jazeera.

This deterioration in press freedom marks a radical change from past years. Since the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, the international community has consistently denounced human rights violations, even if there are big gaps between words and actions. But press freedom had been steadily advancing in recent years. One might conclude, with the abuses of the past few months, that this period is ending. That the major powers now have other priorities and are little concerned about whether those marching behind the anti-terrorist banner are respecting human rights or not. RSF's annual report of more than 700 pages includes evidence of this and the organisation is extremely concerned by such abuses.

As always, RSF deplores attacks on freedom of expression wherever they occur. In this annual report, 150 countries are criticised - many familiar enemies of human rights but also governments not often seen in their company. Measures have been taken in the United States and Canada that challenge a journalist's right not to reveal sources and that increase monitoring of the Internet. The European Union is not spared either. Events there include murders in Spain and the United Kingdom as part of the Basque and Northern Ireland conflicts, the control of most of the Italian media by that country's prime minister, the detention and conviction of journalists in France and Germany and the concentration of written press ownership and interference in the audiovisual media in Austria.

To mark International Press Freedom Day, Reporters Without Borders is also publishing a new album of photographs, this year devoted to the work of Yann Arthus-Bertrand. It is sold at newsstands and the proceeds enable RSF to fund its daily work, including help for journalists and media in difficulty and on-the-spot investigations to establish responsibility for abuses.

Putting a face to enemies of press freedom is absolutely vital if the impunity enjoyed by far too many authoritarian, dictatorial and totalitarian regimes is to be rolled back. The new list of "Predators of press freedom will be published on 3 May on the www.rsf.org


Back to Top

03.05.2002: RSF - Annual Report 2002 >> Burma Chapter

BURMA
Surface area: 676,552 sq. km.
Population: 47,749,000
Languages: Burmese, English
Type of State: military junta
Head of State: General Than Shwe
Vice-president: General Maung Aye

Burma has the sad privilege of being the world's largest prison for journalists. The dialogue begun between the military junta and the democratic opposition did not lead to any significant improvement in press freedom in 2001. Censorship is still as strict as always.

In spite of the release of journalists Soe Thein, in June, and San San Nweh, on 18 July, the military junta has still not emptied its prisons. Even worse, some journalists, such as Sein Hla Oo, who have reached the end of their sentences, have still not been released. However, since October 2000, the military junta and the National League for Democracy (NLD, the organisation headed by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi) regularly meet for discussions, and more than 200 opponents, including NLD members of Parliament-elect, have been released. 'We have moved from the darkest pessimism to careful optimism,' says one diplomat posted in Rangoon.

Several journalists are still held in Burmese jails in life-threatening conditions. Harsh conditions are still commonplace in some prisons and detention centres, and some journalists suffer from serious mental disorders resulting from long periods of isolation. Arrested and convicted to heavy prison sentences for 'circulating information hostile to the State', owning undeclared video cameras, talking with foreign journalists or sending information to Burmese media in exile, most of the journalists imprisoned in the country are also members of the NLD.

Radio, television and all daily newspapers are in the hands of the military junta. The front pages of Burma's newspapers unrelentingly show the country's generals and other dignitaries. The first television channel, TV Myanmar, is controlled by the Ministry of Information, and the second, TV Myawady, is controlled by the army. The State controls all daily newspapers. In addition to the official media, there are about sixty privately-owned magazines (weeklies and monthlies) called 'gya-neh', which are strictly controlled by the censorship office. Some of these publications are owned by generals or their close associates, and they contain people news, articles on international, national and economic events, stories on cultural and sporting events, short fiction and comics. The only publication that dares print articles that would not make it into Burmese-language publications is the Myanmar Times, a privately-owned English-language weekly. But this magazine is too expensive for most Burmese. Censorship, threats and arrests are still routine for journalists working for the few private media in the country, and for political activists who speak out against the situation in Burma. In spite of this, Lieutenant General Khin Nyunt stated in March that press freedom was 'sufficiently respected'. Khin Nyunt, the number three leader of the junta, asked state-owned publications to improve their quality to attract new readers. And he again warned those who 'attempted to publish information that could affect the people'.

Foreign journalists are not treated any better. 'As soon as there's a little bit of news in Burma, we can no longer get press visas. Normally, we can get one-week visas, at best,' said one journalist from a western press agency based in Bangkok. For some ten years now, foreign journalists have been trying to get around the drastic controls imposed by the military regime in power in Rangoon. Dozens of them are on this country's black list. Some of them were forcefully expelled before being added to this black list, which includes reporters from the Voice of America, the Far Eastern Economic Review, the French dailies Le Monde and Libération, the New York Times, the BBC radio and the French television channel France 2. The few journalists who still try to cover Burma do so with tourist visas, hoping that they will not attract the attention of the omnipresent MIS (Military Intelligence Service). Foreign journalists are regularly accused of being 'enemies of the country' and 'neo-colonialists'. In April, the official daily The New Light of Myanmar called Western journalists 'the fifth column of old-fashioned neo-colonialism'. However, for the first time in years, the official press did not publish attacks (caricatures and insults) against the Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi on 13 January. Several days later, it was confirmed that leaders of the junta ordered that articles insulting the opposition leader no longer be published, following a request by the UN emissary Razali Ismail.

The only uncensored news available in Burmese is that broadcast by international radio stations. The BBC, Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Asia (RFA) and the Democratic Voice of Burma have large audiences in the country for their daily news programs.

But in 2001, the Burmese junta, still under sanctions from the European Union and the United States of America, seemed to realise how important it was to look like a 'more open regime' to the outside world. Advised by their Asian friends, especially Malaysia, the Burmese military allowed the creation of a new FM radio station which broadcasts 'light and entertaining' programmes. In July, the authorities also announced the creation of an English-language satellite television channel that was to show the 'true face of life in the country'. Finally, in September, the military junta announced that it would resume issuing licenses for satellite dishes. This had not been possible since 1993, except for hotels catering to tourists and some administrations.

Eighteen journalists jailed

As of 1 January 2002, at least eighteen journalists were jailed in Burma: Aung Pwint, Kyi Tin Oo, Ko Sein Ohn, Khin Aye Kyu, Myint Thein, Yan Aung Soe, Thaung Tun, Win Tin, Sein Hlaing, Myo Myint Nyein, Ohn Kyaing, Sein Hla Oo, Khin Maung Win (Sunny), Tha Ban, Aung Zin Min, Thein Tan, Cho Seint and Aung Myint.

Aung Pwint was sentenced to eight years in prison several months after his arrest in September 1999 for 'illegal possession of a fax machine', and for sending information to banned Burmese publications. He is currently held in Insein prison. A poet and video producer, Aung Pwint, fifty-five years old, is a well-known Burmese media personality. In 1996, the authorities banned the broadcasting of his video reports on the situation in Burma, considered 'too negative'. Aung Pwint is also a democratic activist who spent three years in prison in the 1970s. His wife, a teacher, lives in Pathein, in Irrawaddy province, with their two children.

Journalist and poet Kyi Tin Oo was arrested on 1 March 1994. Several weeks later, he was sentenced to ten years in prison by a special Court in Insein prison according to articles 5(j) of the law for the protection of the State, and 17(1) of the law concerning illegal association. The authorities blamed him for political articles published in the monthly Moe Wai (closed in 1996 for financial reasons) and in the magazine Tha-bin, banned in 1988. Kyi Tin Oo, fifty-seven years old, already spent three years in jail in the 1960s, then seven more years beginning in 1978, and finally a few months after the 1988 coup d'etat. Kyi Tin Oo has therefore spent eighteen of the last forty years of his life in jail. According to a journalist currently living in exile in Thailand, Kyin Tin Oo is 'well-known in journalistic and literary circles for his columns on daily life in Burma. He has always had a deep love of our peoples' culture. He wrote very beautiful articles full of compassion for those who suffer.' Kyi Tin Oo has been married to Than Yi, known by her pen name Kyaw Zaw, writer and owner of a small bookshop, since 1970. He has four children, including Aung Kyaw Hein, who is serving a fourteen-year prison sentence in Khaley for belonging to a banned student movement. Kyi Tin Oo's health is poor; he suffers from chronic hypertension resulting from the awful prison conditions.

Ko Sein Ohn and Khin Aye Kyu, brother and sister, were arrested together in September 1996 and sentenced to ten years in prison for distributing videotapes not approved by a censor, and for possessing 'imported video copying equipment' without official permission. Ko Sein Ohn, currently forty-eight years old, made films of Aung San Suu Kyi and reports critical to policies of the junta when he was a cameraman with the NLD. In July 1996, he interviewed peasants who complained about the authorities' negligence in providing assistance after the serious floods of the Irrawaddy delta. This report was taken out of the country. Two other members of the NLD and two peasants were allegedly also arrested after this report was made. He and his sister are being held in Insein prison. As for Khin Aye Kyu, she was arrested for her activities as a photographer with the NLD. She was also accused of distributing videotapes not approved by a censor.

Myint Thein, known by his pen name Myint Myat Thein, is a teacher and journalist specialised in international relations. He worked for several magazines including the monthly Ah-twe-Ah-myin, founded by Soe Thein, Shwe Wut None, Nweny and Thaung-pyaung-htway-la. He was arrested on 4 December 1996 during the student demonstrations in Rangoon, and severely beaten by police officers during his interrogation. Myint Thein was convicted, several weeks later, to seven years in jail for supporting the student movement, especially through his articles. He is currently being held in Thayet prison.

Yan Aung Soe was arrested in October 1998 by members of the Military Intelligence Service (MIS), and sentenced, several weeks later, by a special court to fifty-nine years in prison for being 'in contact with foreign organisations'. Yan Aung Soe is known for his articles on education published between 1994 and 1997 in semi-legal university journals (Unity, New Century, etc.), then in private magazines such as Thought and Your Life. An activist in student associations and the NLD since the age of fifteen, he was in charge of writing and distributing leaflets for these organisations. He was tortured during his interrogation at an MIS centre. He is currently held in Myaungmya prison, in the south of the country.

Thaung Tun, born in 1959, better known by his pen name Nyein Thit, is a journalist and poet. He worked for the magazine Padaut Pwint Thit, which was banned in 1995. He also wrote for the Rangoon city magazine and produced video reports for independent production companies. As a political activist, he was forced to live in hiding for several years. Arrested on 4 October 1999, he was tortured during his interrogation, which lasted more than three weeks. Two months later, he was convicted by a special Court and sentenced to eight years in prison according to article 5(j) for collecting information concerning human rights violations in Burma and sending it overseas. Initially held in Insein prison, he was transferred to Moulmein prison (capital of the Mon state) in April 2001. Originally from Mandalay, this journalist is also known for his poems. He already spent three years in prison in the late 1970s. He is reportedly in good health, but the only visits he receives are those of his wife and mother who live in Mandalay (more than a thousand kilometres from the prison) once every two months.

Sein Hlaing is imprisoned in building 3 of Tharrawaddy prison where he was transferred in November 1997 after spending seven years in Insein. He is serving a fourteen-year sentence. He was convicted, on 15 November 1990, and sentenced to seven years in jail for publishing an article entitled 'What is going on?' in the magazine Yin-Kyae-Mu (Cultural). The military court also found him guilty of publishing satirical poems ridiculing the military junta. On 28 March 1996, he was sentenced to an additional seven years in jail for taking part in writing a document denouncing human rights violations; this document was sent to the United Nations' special rapporteur on Burma. According to one of his former cellmates, Sein Hlaing has lost a great deal of weight and has no more hair. His three sisters can only visit him once each month.

Win Tin was arrested 4 July 1989 and placed in detention in Insein prison. Successively sentenced to three (October 1989), ten (June 1992) and seven years in prison (March 1996), he is serving a combined twenty-year prison sentence. Charges against Win Tin for his third trial state that he 'secretly published anti-governmental propaganda' while in jail. He is being held in a special section of Insein prison, in cell 10, but his very poor health has forced the authorities to regularly transfer him to the prison hospital. During the twelve years he has spent in jail so far, Win Tin has suffered two heart attacks, a herniated disc and underwent one operation. Because of the poor prison conditions, he has also lost most of his teeth, and, for several months, the authorities refused to provide him with dentures. Former editor-in-chief of the newspaper Hanthawathi, author of many articles against the regime and close advisor to Aung San Suu Kyi, Win Tin, now 71 years old, refused several times to sign a letter of resignation from the NLD in exchange for his freedom. Admired by political prisoners, he is called Saya (The Wise Man) by Aung San Suu Kyi and NLD activists. According to a former political prisoner, he constantly kept up peaceful resistance to the authorities' orders and discussed politics often with his cellmates. He was the one who finished writing the document on prison conditions in Insein, which was secretly sent to the UN special rapporteur. While being held in one of the prison kennels, in 1995, Win Tin made a speech celebrating Burma's national day.

Aung Myint was sentenced to twenty-one years in jail on 20 December 2000 for passing on NLD information to foreign press agencies and western embassies in Rangoon. He had already been arrested on 14 September 2000 by men of MIS Unit 14. He is held in Insein prison. Better known by his pen name, 'Phyapon' Ni Loan Oo, this former journalist with the magazines Cherry and Mahaythi saw many of his articles and poems refused by private magazines or blocked by censors. His wife, Ma Tha Bye, a well-known writer, is editor-in-chief of the magazine Cherry.

Aung Zin Min has been imprisoned in Tharrawaddy since May 1997, after spending several months in Insein prison. He was arrested in December 1996, together with journalist Cho Seint, and sentenced to seven years for supporting the student demonstrations of 1996 in his articles and poems, published in the magazine New Style, where he was part of the editorial staff. Currently fifty-one years old, he suffers from headaches and dysentery. He is also depressed and worried about the fate of his destitute family. In 1998, he tried to smuggle out of jail fifty short poems written on bits of plastic. A guard caught him just as he was handing them over to his wife during a visit. The poems were confiscated and he lost visiting rights for more than a month.

Kyaw San, known by the pen name Cho Seint, was transferred to Tharrawaddy in May 1997. He was sentenced to seven years in prison for supporting the 1996 student demonstrations in his articles and poems, published in opposition magazines. He was severely beaten during his interrogation in early 1997, and has suffered from partial hearing loss since then. Grandson of Thakin Kotaw Hmime, one of the fathers of independence with general Aung San, his family was deliberately deprived of its means by the military authorities. He has practically no visits nor outside assistance. According to one of his former cellmates, he has never lost his fighting spirit and even took part in a June 1998 hunger strike asking for more water and that the cell doors be opened during the day. The prisoners succeeded in obtaining their demands.

Myo Myint Nyein was arrested 12 September 1990 and convicted to seven years in prison, in November 1990, for publishing in the magazine Yin-Kyae-Mu (Cultural), of which he was co-editor, an article entitled 'What is going on?', and in March 1996 to seven more years in prison for participating in the creation of underground magazines in Insein prison. He is therefore serving a fourteen-year sentence in Tharrawaddy prison where he was transferred in 1996 after six years spent in Insein. In July 1995, journalist Myo Myint Nyein was one of sixty-three political prisoners, in Insein prison, punished by the military authorities for collecting information on prison conditions and sending it to the United Nations special rapporteur. For this 'crime', he was locked up, from 11 September 1995 to 7 May 1996, in one of the cages of the Insein prison kennel where prisoners sleep on the concrete floor and receive no health care and no visits. During his last months in the kennel, Myo Myint Nyein, now forty-nine years old, started having nightmares. 'In the middle of the night, he would suddenly rise up and start screaming incomprehensibly. We tried to wake him up but he kept on. He was hallucinating, and his attacks became increasingly violent,' said Zin Linn, one of his cellmates, now living in exile in Bangkok. Prior to September 1995, Myo Myint Nyein already had severe intestinal problems and migraines. Unable to correctly digest food, he often vomited his meagre rations. After May 1996, his health worsened drastically. Wasted away, weakened and depressed, all he could count on was the support of his fellow prisoners. After being transferred to Tharrawaddy prison in September 1997, he saw one of his cellmates die. The death of Nyunt Zaw, an NLD member, affected his moral greatly and worsened his mental health. Myo Myint Nyein's daughter, living in exile in Japan, is very worried about his health. 'They are killing him slowly.' Zin Linn, one of his former cellmates in the kennel, added, 'The isolation cells, the interrogations and the untreated illnesses have gotten the better of Myo Myint Nyein, who was a vigorous man. The son of a well-known Burmese boxer, and an athlete himself, he was in excellent physical shape before.'

Ohn Kyaing, better known by the pen name Aung Wint, is serving a seventeen-year sentence (sentenced to seven years in October 1990 and ten years in May 1991) in Toungoo prison after being transferred from Insein in late 1993. He was member of Parliament-elect for the NLD in the city of Mandalay. Successively a journalist for Kyemon, Botahtaung and the magazine Youqshin Aunglan, Ohn Kyaing is known for writing articles in favour of democracy. He was convicted for publishing an article 'The Three Paths to Obtain Power' in an opposition publication. Born in 1944, Ohn Kyaing suffers from high blood pressure and haemorrhoids. He is married and a father of four. His wife had to sell half of their house to meet Ohn Kyaing's needs.

Sein Hla Oo has been held in Myitkyina prison since February 1997. Before that, he was in Insein prison after being arrested in August 1994 together with San San Nweh. He is serving a seven-year sentence that was to end in August 2001. He is a member of Parliament-elect and was convicted of distributing some of his articles, considered 'anti-governmental', to foreign embassies and media. This former journalist with Botahtaung has a journalism degree from a North-American university, and is a well-known cinema critic. Myitkyina prison, in the north of the country, is known to have more difficult conditions than Insein. Prisoners suffer, more than in other prisons, from malaria, cold, the brutality of the guards and very poor food. Visits from family members are much rarer as well. It takes more than two days to reach the prison from Rangoon, and costs the equivalent of one month's salary. On 15 June 2001, Sein Hla Oo was transferred to Myitkyina hospital and operated on for a slipped disc. After a few days of convalescence, he was sent back to prison. The authorities did not consider it was necessary to notify his wife. In August, she moved closer to her husband in the expectation of his release, but returned to Rangoon without him. As of 1 January 2002, Soin Hla Oo has still not been released, five months after the end of his sentence.

Khin Maung Win, known by the pen name Sunny, is reportedly held in the new Kalay prison (in the north-west of the country, near the Indian border). He was sentenced to seven years for being involved in an interview with Aung San Suu Kyi before the ASEAN (Association of South-Eastern Asian Nations) summit in 1997. According to the authorities, Sunny was member of a group involved in anti-governmental activities. Several weeks after his June 1997 arrest, Lieutenant General Khin Nyunt called them 'puppets of the American government'. His wife recently sent a letter to NLD headquarters explaining the difficulties she encountered trying to visit her husband.

Thein Tan was sentenced to ten years in prison and is being held in Thayet prison, after spending six years in Insein. Owner of a bookstore in Mandalay, his home city, he wrote for the official publication Kyemon before working with several private magazines in the 1980s. He was convicted by a military court for writing an article about the killing of four people in Mandalay in August 1990. He was arrested in late 1990. His health has reportedly deteriorated greatly in recent months. He is currently seventy-one years old.

Tha Ban was arrested in March 1997 and sentenced to seven years in prison for his articles in favour of democracy. He was also convicted for helping a student who was collecting information on the history of a student association. He was reportedly transferred from Insein prison to that in Arakan state (west of the country) where he is from. Sixty-four years old, Tha Ban has suffered from dysentery in recent years and can only count on his wife, a retired schoolteacher, to bring him medicine. His health worsened in 1995, but the authorities refused to transfer him to the hospital. His vision has recently deteriorated, and, according to his family, he may become blind if he does not get treatment from a specialist. Authorities have so far turned down this request.

Reporters without Borders is continuing its investigation into the reasons the four following opponents were imprisoned: